The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) confirmed a ruling by the Higher Regional Court of Hamm (OLG Hamm), dismissing a case brought by the textile company Textilveredlung Drechsel, Selb, against its electricity supplier regarding the surcharge for renewable energy (EEG surcharge).
Plaintiff had alleged unconstitutionality of the EEG surcharge, arguing it was an unlawful special levy (Sonderabgabe) that increased energy costs to the detriment of small and middle-sized (textile) companies.
In line with OLG Hamm, BGH did not consider the EEG surcharge a special levy (Sonderabgabe) for which strict rules have to be observed to comply with the articles on the constitutional financial system pursuant to the German Constitution (Grundgesetz). BGH argued that the surcharge was not collected by the state (which, however, prescribed the EEG surcharge system in detail), but by the electricity suppliers. It therefore considered the surcharge to be a statutory price stipulation (“gesetzliche Preisregelung”), for which the rules developed by the courts for special levies were not applicable, not even mutatis mutandis. Parliament also did not exceed its competences when choosing to regulate the EEG surcharge in the form of a statutory price stipulation, BGH held. Furthermore it dismissed a breach of constitutional rights of the transmission system operators, electricity suppliers or final customers.
The trade association Gesamtverband texil + mode (t+m), which has been supporting plaintiff all along, continues to consider the EEG surcharge unconstitutional. The ruling could now be challenged with a constitutional complaint, t + m commented.
Source: BGH, ref. no. VIII ZR 169/13; t+m
Related posts:
- OLG Hamm Dismisses EEG Surcharge Case But Grants Leave to Appeal
- Stuttgart Court Does Not Stay Lawsuit Against EEG Surcharge to Submit Case to Federal Constitutional Court
- LG Bochum Dismisses Law Suit by Textile Company against EEG Surcharge
- Renewable Surcharge for 2013 Rises by Almost 47% to 5.277 ct/kWh
- Law Suits Against EEG Surcharge Make Headlines
- Increase of Surcharge Due to Grid Fee Exemptions for Energy-intensive Companies?
- Middle-sized Textile Companies to Challenge EEG Surcharge – Vowalon Stops Payment
- Handelsblatt: Another Considerable Rise of EEG Surcharge on the Horizon
- EEG Surcharge Forecast 2013: Increase to Between 3.66 and 4.74 ct/kWh
- 2012 EEG Surcharge Increases Slightly to 3.592 ct/kWh
- Oettinger: German EEG Surcharge Moving Towards 6 ct/kWh
- Speculation about Rising EEG Reallocation in 2012
- EEG Surcharge for 2011 Too High?
- 72% Increase in EEG Renewable Energy Reallocation Charges for 2011
BGH: EEG Surcharge Not Unconstitutional http://t.co/EqKNv5XWT4 (GER Energy Blog)
RT @EnergiewendeGER: BGH: EEG Surcharge Not Unconstitutional http://t.co/EqKNv5XWT4 (GER Energy Blog)